Showing posts with label Top-down. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Top-down. Show all posts

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Auditing the Federal Reserve is Economic Suicide


Given the potentially fatal repercussions, auditing the Federal Reserve is one of the most underreported stories by the media today. Investors today should be fearful of this development. It is shocking to see three out of four Americans supporting a bill that could lead to economic catastrophe. The passing of Ron Paul’s H.R. 1207 bill may bring serious and unintended inflationary consequences that can destroy investors’ wealth.

While it may not be the intent of the lawmakers, Ron Paul’s bill, a.k.a. Federal Reserve Transparency Act, will enable the congress to influence the outcomes of monetary policy through an audit of the Federal Reserve’s day-to-day operations, thus severely compromising the independence of the U.S. central bank from political influences.

The free market understands that auditing the fed is a very dangerous line to cross. If crossed, U.S. inflation will likely skyrocket over the next decade to unseen levels. The U.S. economy will tank under a hyperinflationary environment. Bond investors lose money as interest rates rise. Stock investors earn negative real return as equity risk premium rises and aggregate PE ratio nose dives. The US Dollar erodes due to higher domestic inflation relative to foreign inflation. Gold and commodity prices rise.

How Does Auditing the Fed Cause Inflation?

Inflation is caused by a central bank that loses control of its money supply. There are two ways that a politically compromised central bank can lose control of its money supply.

Road to Inflation #1: Repeating the Political Cycle

When the central bank is not independent, politicians have historically pumped up the money supply (for temporary economic boost) shortly before an election to buy votes with lower unemployment rate. After the election, the effects wear off, returning the economy to its natural rate of unemployment but at a higher inflation rate than before. Because it is hard to fight off inflation quickly, by the time the next election rolls around the economy has not been squeezed back to its original inflation rate. Politicians pump up the money supply again, this time from a higher base inflation. As this cycle repeats itself, the central bank loses control of the money supply.

Road to Inflation #2: Financing Government Spending

A central bank that lacks independence from politicians makes it tempting for the government to finance an inappropriately large portion of its spending through printing money. A central bank that promises to finance too much government spending also loses control of the money supply.

Will the Bill Pass?

Although Obama and his economic team oppose this bill, it may not matter much. The risk of the bill passing is increasing every day. Ron Paul is using the recent economic recession as an opportunity to sway angry politicians to advance his personal agenda of ending the fed. The table below shows that government officials are embracing the Federal Reserve audit. In fact, support is so overwhelming that we are dangerously close to reaching the veto-proof status. Once reached, the President will have little say in the outcome. Deadline for voting of this bill has been set to December 2010.

In sum, auditing the Fed’s daily operations will cause it to succumb to political pressure, lose control of the money supply, and create sticky inflation that could be much worse than the 1970’s. America is an angry nation right now. When it comes time to vote on the bill, it remains to be seen if cooler heads will prevail or if America will swallow the economic suicide pill.

*Related links: Reactions from 6 economists, Bernanke, Bernanke (2), Geithner, Washington Post, and general public.

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Buy Physical Oil, Not Energy Stocks

Enjoying the lower gas prices lately? Well, now's the the time to fill up your tank some more because oil prices may be on its way up again. The chart on the right shows the ratio between energy stocks and crude oil prices, and in the background is oil price. Notice that high points in the ratio are associated with a bottom in oil prices. If you subscribe to the commodities supercycle theory, this may be your chance to stockpile on oil again. Looks like this is exactly what Jim Rogers is doing.

As a commodities bear, I personally do not believe this is a long-term buying opportunity for oil. There are three conditions that need to be met for me to consider commodities.

1. Currencies of commodities producing countries bottom
2. Real assets become undervalued to financial assets
3. US dollar about to enter a long-term bear market

Currently, none of the three conditions are met, which means any bounces in oil are merely bear market rallies within a long-term commodities bear market.

Friday, November 28, 2008

This is a Mid-cap Rally

So is this the Santa clause/year-end/super-bear rally we've been waiting for? The S&P 500 has just gained 18% in the past five trading days. "Does it have legs," ask fund managers everywhere who are suffering from performance-anxiety attacks.

Well, we're currently in what I call a mid-cap rally, where mid-cap stocks outperform small-cap and large-cap stocks. Last time the mid-caps led the market we had a 70-day rally from March to May 2008.

Some say that the March rally had legs because it kicked off with a Lowry's 90-90 day on March 19th. However, the October rally had two 90-90 days on Oct 13th and Oct 28th; that rally turned out to be short-lived, lasting only 3 weeks. Clearly, 90-90 day was not the answer.

I recorded all the bear market rallies lasting longer than 1 day from both the 2000-2002 bear and the current bear.

Start End Length (days)
Leadership (overall)
10/10/2008 10/13/2008 3 Large-cap
7/23/2002 8/23/2002 31 Large-cap
2/6/2008 2/26/2008 20 Mid-cap
11/26/2007 12/10/2007 14 Mid-cap
3/10/2008 5/19/2008 70 Mid-cap
4/6/2001 5/18/2001 42 Mid-cap
10/27/2008 11/4/2008 8 Small-cap
1/22/2008 2/1/2008 10 Small-cap
7/15/2008 8/11/2008 27 Small-cap
10/17/2008 10/20/2008 3 Small-cap
12/17/2007 12/26/2007 9 Small-cap

Average large-cap bear market rally = 17 days
Average mid-cap bear market rally = 36.5 days
Average small-cap bear market rally = 11.4 days

It appears that the average mid-cap rally lasts longer than the average large-cap or small-cap rally. Does someone have an explanation for why mid-cap rallies last longer? Otherwise, it could simply be a case of curve fitting.

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Canadian Stocks: A Large Decline Is Brewing

There are five major divergences occurring on the Canadian TSX stock index. These conditions have led to steep declines in the past. Consider it a heads up warning. If you hold Canadian stocks, you should buy some insurance via XIU puts.

I will be posting a more detailed analysis within the next week.

Friday, March 28, 2008

When Did The Recession Start?

Hugh Cleland made an interesting observation about recession and the stock market. He noted that the NBER start date of the recession in 1990 coincided with the top in the S&P 500. Using this relationship, he conjectured that the market top in October 2007 may be the start date of the recession.

However, data from the past 7 US recessions reveal that this relationship was not repeated in any of the other 6 recessions and therefore, is a mere coincidence. So when did the recession actually start?

Below are ECRI’s official recession calls in the past:
Feb. 6, 1990 by Geoffrey Moore. Lead time = 6 months.
Mar. 26, 2001 by Anirvan Banerji. Lead time = 0 months.
Mar. 21, 2008 by Lakshman Achuthan. Lead time = ?

My own speculation is that ECRI’s recession call is late this time around. There was solid evidence for a recession call in January 2008. Unfortunately, ECRI was hoping that rapid rate cuts by the Fed could help avert a recession. They did not realize that this particular recession, driven by a deflating credit bubble, would increase the time needed for monetary stimulus to work itself into the economy.

Hence, until NBER announces the official recession dates for this cycle, I will assume that it began in January 2008.
------------------------
Edit: NBER's Business Cycle Dating Committee announced on December 11, 2008 that the recession officially began in December 2007. My speculations have been proven correct and ECRI was late by 3 months in calling the recession.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Growth vs Value: A Short Reversal?




Growth stocks have been trouncing value stocks since last summer. The financial-heavy value indices have been lagging severely behind value indices during the current housing recession. This has benefited growth stocks as the VIX set new highs and risk aversion picked up.

Could value stocks make a temporary come back here after 6 months? I think so. Plotting growth vs value, we see the enormous outperformance of the Rydex Pure Growth index relative to the Value index. But the negative divergence on the daily and weekly RSI, the channel throwover, as well as the extremely overbought MACD seems to suggest a short-term comeback for value stocks is due. Previous periods where growth lagged value during the current advance has lasted half a month on average. Bottom line: overweighting the value stocks for the next 2-3 weeks should generate some decent alpha.

Strategy: Buy financial stocks with above average short % of float to benefit from the shortsqueeze. Aggressive investors should buy some January call options.